<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glossy vs. matte</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netwalker.nl/2007/07/28/glossy-vs-matte/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netwalker.nl/2007/07/28/glossy-vs-matte/</link>
	<description>exploring the web and random thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 12:39:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: marko</title>
		<link>http://netwalker.nl/2007/07/28/glossy-vs-matte/comment-page-1/#comment-49724</link>
		<dc:creator>marko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 12:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netwalker.nl/2007/07/28/glossy-vs-matte/#comment-49724</guid>
		<description>I can confirm, that LED vs non-LED makes a really big difference. I own a MacBook with non-LED glossy screen which is quite good. But while my MB was in repair I had a MBPro with a LED glossy screen (the one I had during Agile Open in Utrecht) and the difference was enormous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can confirm, that LED vs non-LED makes a really big difference. I own a MacBook with non-LED glossy screen which is quite good. But while my MB was in repair I had a MBPro with a LED glossy screen (the one I had during Agile Open in Utrecht) and the difference was enormous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://netwalker.nl/2007/07/28/glossy-vs-matte/comment-page-1/#comment-33619</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netwalker.nl/2007/07/28/glossy-vs-matte/#comment-33619</guid>
		<description>Well, the problem is that yes, you can&#039;t compare the old 17&quot; with a new MBP LED since the brightness is SO different. The old 17&quot; powerbook had an even dimmer screen than the regular 15&quot; powerbooks. 

the new LED matte MBP are very good in sunlight, a little less bright than the glossy but without the reflections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the problem is that yes, you can&#8217;t compare the old 17&#8243; with a new MBP LED since the brightness is SO different. The old 17&#8243; powerbook had an even dimmer screen than the regular 15&#8243; powerbooks. </p>
<p>the new LED matte MBP are very good in sunlight, a little less bright than the glossy but without the reflections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walker</title>
		<link>http://netwalker.nl/2007/07/28/glossy-vs-matte/comment-page-1/#comment-33571</link>
		<dc:creator>walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 10:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netwalker.nl/2007/07/28/glossy-vs-matte/#comment-33571</guid>
		<description>@Thorsten: I&#039;ve read people claiming, that the led matte is much better but until now I haven&#039;t seen a comparison yet. Personally I can not imagine how any matte display works well in direct sunlight, even if it is brighter (as with the new led technology).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Thorsten: I&#8217;ve read people claiming, that the led matte is much better but until now I haven&#8217;t seen a comparison yet. Personally I can not imagine how any matte display works well in direct sunlight, even if it is brighter (as with the new led technology).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thorsten</title>
		<link>http://netwalker.nl/2007/07/28/glossy-vs-matte/comment-page-1/#comment-33569</link>
		<dc:creator>Thorsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 09:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netwalker.nl/2007/07/28/glossy-vs-matte/#comment-33569</guid>
		<description>really liked your post, but then i saw you used an older matte model. you definitely can&#039;t compare a led and a non-led. there&#039;s a huuuge difference.

can u update the post with a led matte?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really liked your post, but then i saw you used an older matte model. you definitely can&#8217;t compare a led and a non-led. there&#8217;s a huuuge difference.</p>
<p>can u update the post with a led matte?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alv</title>
		<link>http://netwalker.nl/2007/07/28/glossy-vs-matte/comment-page-1/#comment-33312</link>
		<dc:creator>Alv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 05:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netwalker.nl/2007/07/28/glossy-vs-matte/#comment-33312</guid>
		<description>Finally a good side by side/real situation review!!.

Thanks. that helped me a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally a good side by side/real situation review!!.</p>
<p>Thanks. that helped me a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://netwalker.nl/2007/07/28/glossy-vs-matte/comment-page-1/#comment-16413</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 00:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netwalker.nl/2007/07/28/glossy-vs-matte/#comment-16413</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that. Ive just ordered a new 15&quot; with the glossy screen, and was starting to get a little concerned because of all the negative comments on the net. You have set my mind at ease.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that. Ive just ordered a new 15&#8243; with the glossy screen, and was starting to get a little concerned because of all the negative comments on the net. You have set my mind at ease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

